Scroll the menu to find all the places to visit
Evidence Net Workshop 2
31 Jul 2009Last week I attended a second workshop on Evidence Net. It was launched a few weeks ago at The Higher Education Academy Annual Conference 2009 and has been growing in use across the HE sector ever since.
The previous Evidence Net workshop was aimed at identifying the sorts of features that the second phase of the Evidence Net site might have. This workshop was very much aimed at prioritising the suggested features.
The workshop began with an activity to get some idea of people’s initial thoughts around some of the ideas that were to be discussed later in the day. People were asked to stand in a line with their position representing how strongly they felt about a topic. This sparked off a bit of discussion and the day then started in earnest.
The next activity was a short listing of the feature sets by each person. A summation of the votes was carried out and this was used to specify the prioritisation of the features. The top feature identified was functionality around adding resources to Evidence Net.
The workshop was split into groups to discuss how the addition of resources should take place. This included not only articles, case studies, papers, etc. but also things like events and collaborative networks. The groups came up with details about how things should work and some basic workflows and ideas for things the interface should offer to an Evidence Net user and an Evidence Net administrator. The workshop spent a good while discussing the options raised and how this would affect the usage of the site.
With time fast disappearing the afternoon kept the group set-up but with each group tackling just one of the next four or five priority sets. Each group presented their ideas and the whole group discussed each for a few minutes.
One factor that kept cropping up was that of having users login. As well as helping to identify and log who would be contributing what it just as importantly formed the basis of allowing the site to deliver customised content such as recommendations and news about updates.
Overall it was again a very lively workshop which I hope everyone got a positive experience from attending. I’m sure that the Evidence Net team came away with lots of useful views and ideas that will keep them busy analysing for weeks to come. The workshop is just one of several second stage activities that the Evidence Net team are carrying out and I would guess that the other activities are likely in the main to identify the same sorts of features.
These wide user base information gathering activities should help to ensure that the best possible range of input is obtained to develop the next phase of this resource and I’m looking forward to seeing what impact we’ve had on defining the feature set of Evidence Net phase 2 and from my personal perspective the technologies and solutions identified to deliver what is potentially quite a complex but rich set of requirements. It will almost certainly be a phased delivery but the final version will surely be an exceptional educational resource.
